Question Raised on Trustee’s Status

Bowman says his departure from village temporary

By Kevin E. Foley

On the latest Village Board front, Trustee Michael Bowman and family have moved out of the village to his ailing mother’s home in Nelsonville, calling into question his status as a trustee. State and village law require trustees to be residents.

Bowman has characterized the move as temporary. He has ended the rental agreement for his village residence.

Bowman is also apparently angry over an email inquiry from Mayor Dave Merandy asking him to confirm his departure and suggesting he offer his resignation if he has left the village.

Further inflaming the situation, the Putnam County News and Recorder ran a headline this week, above a story by reporter Tim Greco, accusing Merandy of trying to force Bowman out of office while his mother is ill. Bowman expressed his outrage in that article.

Michael Bowman (Photo by Jennifer Konig)

Michael Bowman (Photo by Jennifer Konig)

In an interview on Wednesday (June 3), Merandy and Trustee Marie Early said they hadn’t heard from Bowman as to his intentions, but after learning of his departure felt obligated to ascertain his plans and what he thought of his status as a trustee. Befitting the intimacy of a small village, Early was Bowman’s landlord and therefore first alerted Merandy to the situation.

Merandy said he believed he was required as mayor to ask Bowman his intentions despite the personal nature of the circumstances. “It’s a matter of the law. Do people want me to ignore the law? I don’t think I should do that,” he said.

Early concurred and said she believed if a trustee moved out of the jurisdiction, he had an obligation to inform the board in a timely manner.

The Paper asked to see the email correspondence between Merandy and Bowman and the mayor provided them.

Merandy’s email:

“Mike, unfortunately through the Cold Spring grapevine I have learned that you have left the village to live with your mom at her home in Nelsonville. As I’m sure you are well aware, holding the office of trustee on the Village of Cold Spring Board of Trustees and living outside the Village is not allowed under NY State Law. In the event that you have moved will you please submit a letter of resignation.

“I’m very sorry to hear that your mom’s health has not improved. Please give her my best. –Dave”

Bowman’s response:

“Dave, Yes I have temporarily relocated to care for her. I am in the process of looking for a suitable alternative in order to retain my residency for next March. I will update the board as soon as I know more. –Michael”

“Next March” evokes the village election when Bowman’s current term expires, indicating his intention to remain in office and run again.

In an email response to an inquiry from The Paper about his side of things, Bowman wrote: “My mother and her health is my top priority at this time. I don’t believe it should be front-page news, nor addressed by the Mayor. The current state of living situations of our local politicians is well documented as cited in the [PCNR] article.

“I was very angry upon the receipt of the Mayor’s email as it did arrive at a very sensitive time. There was a proper time, place and venue for the discussion, an impersonal email was not it.”

Bowman’s reference to other local politicians’ living situations being “well documented” is a bit puzzling. In the PCNR Greco mentions that Nelsonville Mayor Tom Corless currently lives in Cold Spring while asserting that his renovations on his Nelsonville residence have taken much longer than expected — well over a year. This is the only actual example cited, and the retention of a home in the jurisdiction is a basis for arguing that one can continue to serve in office. Whether Corless would be eligible to run for re-election if he still lives outside his village is an interesting question.

Greco also tries to cast Merandy in a negative light (a near weekly occurrence since Merandy first declared for office) by suggesting: “Many people questioned Merandy’s own eligibility to run for office in Cold Spring. He maintains a home in the Highlands, but claimed his wife Stephanie Hawkins’ address as his new address. She lives in the village.” Greco has never cited a single person other than himself who questioned Merandy’s residence. And how claiming your wife’s address (they were married last fall) is questionable is hard to fathom.

Perhaps a more relevant example would be former Trustee John Teagle, who left the board in 2009 when he moved into the Little Stony Point caretaker’s house on Route 9D just north of the Cold Spring line.

New York State law on village governance:

“N.Y. VIL. LAW §3–300: NY Code – Section 3–300: Eligibility for election or appointment to, and continuance in office

“1. In addition to any other legal requirements or prohibitions, no person shall be eligible to be elected or appointed as mayor, trustee or member of any board or commission, and, no person, if elected or appointed to such office, shall be eligible to continue to serve therein, who is not a citizen of the United States of America, at least 18 years of age, and a resident of the village.”

Merandy and Early said they did not know what will happen if Bowman insists that he has a right to participate in the board and vote on matters. They said they would confer with counsel if needed.

14 thoughts on “Question Raised on Trustee’s Status

  1. Wow. When did become a non-neutral news source? This doesn’t even seem like an news report, more of a rebuttal. Pretty disappointed at the tone here.

  2. How about focusing on what really matters most here? My thoughts and prayers are with Mrs. Bowman, Mike and his family right now during what is surely a very difficult time for them.

  3. Thank you, Tom Campanile, I agree with you. My thoughts and prayers are with the Bowman family at this time.

  4. Double wow! What happened to compassion and empathy? When is this tit-for-tat behavior going to stop?

  5. The mayor’s question seems a legitimate one. It does not rule out hopes for improved health for Mr. Bowman’s mother and best wishes to the Bowman family.

  6. There is a time and a season for everything, and the mayor’s actions were acutely tone-deaf. It is hard to rationalize the mayor exercising wisdom on this matter.

    Furthermore, the vital interests of the Village were not at peril to warrant such action; the Trustee was rightfully attending to her ill mother, that is a higher responsibly as a son, and as kindhearted member of our society.

  7. Let us all take a few steps back and give the Bowman family time to themselves. We as a community need to be there for one another and Michael and his family need us.

  8. My mother passed away Friday evening. I found this article completely unneeded beforehand, and especially hurtful afterwards. Hopefully the “news” outlets in this Village (and certain people) use this as a learning experience and realize where the boundary of appropriateness lies, if it exists at all anymore.

    My mother was a great woman and that is all that matters to me at this time. It was my priority on June 1st and still is today.

  9. Now, let me get this straight: One trustee was another trustee’s landlord. When the tenant trustee terminated his lease (suddenly? — we don’t know) because of his mother’s health, the landlord trustee went to the mayor who then heard via the “grapevine” that the tenant trustee had vacated the village, calling into question the tenant trustee’s continued status on the village board. The mayor then sent an official email calling the tenant trustee out on the legal issue of residency, with a closing comment of best wishes to the tenant’s mother. (As the use of quotation marks within the quoted Mayor’s email is erratic, I don’t know if more was written or not.)

    Based on what I’ve read, my takeaway is the disturbing realization that our village (of roughly 2,000) has, at present, devolved into a municipality so divided that our board members cannot engage on personal terms or in personal ways even when one of their own is experiencing a personal crisis.

    How can we hope for anything better going forward?

  10. First of all, the first few lines of this article are not any business of anyone but the Bowman family and not something that should start off as “on the latest village board front.” He was contacted under the guise of genuine concern for his mother’s health and just to get his side of what happened. Not only has this article twisted the facts but it was released at the most inappropriate time possible. How about a little compassion for a family who has meant so much to Cold Spring, Nelsonville, Philipstown, etc? I am disgusted how my husband and his family have been used as rebuttal for what was published in the PCNR. I sincerely hope that after this will now leave him and his family at peace.

  11. My sincere condolences and deepest sympathy to Michael Bowman and his family.

  12. I certainly agree with Donna Bowman! My sincere sympathies and and condolences to Michael and his family.

  13. There is a time and a place for everything. I have emailed Michael Bowman directly to express my deepest sympathy.

    In this forum, I would like to point out that the posting order of the comments above no longer reflects what readers were responding to. Whether some comments were held for corrections or what the reason, I don’t know. But context is everything, and now the order has changed.

    My comment above was posted before learning of Michael Bowman’s mother’s death and before his comment had been publicly posted. In fact, from the article I had no idea of the critical moments ahead. It was only after sending an email directly to Michael (Bowman) that I learned from him that his mother had died.

    At the time I made my comment, only a handful of others had been publicly posted. Donna Bowman’s was one. Now, her comment appears quite far down the list and out of context.

    I think The Paper can do better. Is there a way to reflect not only when the comment was submitted but also when it was publicly posted? Since this has become a public forum, it’s important that the integrity of the conversation be preserved.