Town Board Adopts $9.75M Budget; $7.4M to Come from Taxes

Councilors refuse raises, town clerk protests staff change

By Liz Schevtchuk Armstrong

By a 5-0 vote, the Philipstown Town Board Thursday night (Nov. 19) adopted a $9,751,157 budget for fiscal 2016, with $7,446,049 to come from taxes and the remainder from estimated revenues and reserves.

The action occurred at Town Hall at a special meeting that involved touches of drama over pay increases for the councilors and supervisor and a staff reshuffling in the clerk’s office.

With an increase of approximately 1 percent over the 2015 tax levy, the new budget stays within the New York State-mandated cap. It represents tax rates of 2.37 percent per $1,000 of value (up from 2.30 in 2015) for property-owners who fund overall town-wide functions, and 3.45 percent (down slightly from 3.46) for those who live outside Cold Spring and Nelsonville and get certain town services.

Sample budget lines include:

  • $335,000 for snow removal, 6 percent more than the 2015 figure of $315,000, an increase that reflects an $11,000 shortfall so far this year, due to weather last winter;
  • a 30-percent increase in outlays for buildings, going from $148,000 in 2015 to $193,000 for 2016, due to plans to upgrade Town Hall, renovate a former nearby house as office space, and get a new headquarters for the Highway Department;
  • raises of about $1,000 for nearly all employees;
  • a 4-percent increase in the Recreation Department budget, set at $981,603 for 2016;
  • Trimming the highway superintendent’s pay, from the $92,250 long-time incumbent Roger Chirico earns to $88,000 for Carl Frisenda, who defeated Chirico in the general election this month, a reduction the board described as appropriate for someone new to the position.

Elected officials’ pay

Supervisor Richard Shea’s base pay will go from $26,000 to $27,000 and the stipend he draws as budget officer will increase from $7,000 to $9,000. Pay for the other Town Board members – Councilors Nancy Montgomery, John Van Tassel, Michael Leonard, and Robert Flaherty – will remain $18,000. Town Clerk Tina Merando’s pay will go from $51,000 to $52,000; her overall office allocation will increase by 3 percent, to $112,300.

With Town Clerk Tina Merando (right), Philipstown Town Board members review final  details before voting on a $9.75 million budget for 2016; left to right: Councilors Robert Flaherty and Michael Leonard, Supervisor Richard Shea, and Councilors Nancy Montgomery and John Van Tassel. Photo by L.S. Armstrong

With Town Clerk Tina Merando (right), Philipstown Town Board members review final  details before voting on a $9.75 million budget for 2016; left to right: Councilors Robert Flaherty and Michael Leonard, Supervisor Richard Shea, and Councilors Nancy Montgomery and John Van Tassel. Photo by L.S. Armstrong

Highway Department

While the highway superintendent’s compensation declines, the overall spending for the Highway Department will increase by 13 percent, from $2,850,550 to $3,212,704. One cause: 25 percent more for workmen’s compensation, $88,974 for 2016, up from the 2015 budget’s $70,974 and $20,000 more than the 2014 amount. Highway Department revenues are expected to climb from $161,500 to $171,500.

Fire-fighting expenditures

Fire protection costs will hold steady, with increases of 1 percent for the Continental Village Fire Department, Garrison Volunteer Fire Company, and North Highlands Fire Department, and a zero percent increase for Cold Spring Fire Company No. 1, which serves parts of the town. For 2016, the firefighting allocation is $260,994 for Continental Village; $610,552 for Garrison; $740,015 for North Highlands, and $64,425 for Cold Spring.

Ambulance corps

The $261,000 for the Philipstown Volunteer Ambulance Corps tops the 2015 amount by $37,070, or 17 percent, an increase that Shea attributed to dire needs, including payments on a new ambulance. “There’s no way around it. Without it, they’re not going to be able to provide service,” he said. The Garrison Volunteer Ambulance Corps budget share will go from $170,000 to $171,241.

Van Tassel and Montgomery recommended initiatives to get the two ambulance corps, both of which rely heavily but not entirely on volunteers, to begin pooling their personnel and staffing arrangements. The board discussed mandating such changes in 2016, but opted instead to set aside $10,000 as an incentive for the two corps to collaborate.

“If they pooled their people, it would certainly improve the services,” Van Tassel commented.

Clerk’s office staffing

With the pending retirement of a deputy town clerk, the board decided to reduce the number of deputy clerks from two to one and hire a “floating” professional to handle responsibilities as needed not only for the clerk but for several other departments.

“We’re eliminating the position to save the taxpayers money, to really make our offices more efficient,” Montgomery said. “It makes sense” economically. And if it means the elimination of some things currently done by the clerk’s office, “we can re-invent how they’re done,” she added.

With Councilor John Van Tassel caught in the interchange, Councilor Nancy Montgomery (left) and Town Clerk Tina Merando (right) trade views on staff arrangements for the clerk's office. Photo by L.S. Armstrong

With Councilor John Van Tassel caught in the interchange, Councilor Nancy Montgomery (left) and Town Clerk Tina Merando (right) trade views on staff arrangements for the clerk’s office. Photo by L.S. Armstrong

In an email alert Tuesday night, Merando warned that “due to potential budget cuts in the Town Clerk’s Office the information posted to the town’s website and municipal channel will be limited.”

Thursday night, Merando objected further to the new staffing arrangement. “I don’t see how you can justify it,” she said. “The town is getting busier. I cannot do the work we were doing before,” without the second deputy clerk. She reminded the board that she won re-election easily this month, an indication voters “think I’m doing a good job.” Reconfiguring things “is almost a way to undermine the accomplishment’s I’ve achieved,” she said. “You have nothing to say about how I run my office. The only thing the Town Board does is fund my office.”

“I don’t want to bring politics into this,” since a routine retirement provided a chance to rethink operations, Shea responded. “I think we can get by” with the altered staffing, he concluded.

Rejected raises

The meeting began with the four councilors’ refusal to accept raises of $1,000 each and their attempts to instead give it to Shea. Coming atop the $1,000 pay hike already planned for him, their move would have brought his total pay as supervisor to $31,000. Shea, however, rejected the additional $4,000 and urged that it be saved to meet tax-cap demands next year.

Promoting higher pay for the supervisor, Montgomery pointed out that most towns in Putnam County regard supervisors as full-time officials, earning $80,000 to $120,000. “It’s not me that needs the raise at this point, it’s you,” she told Shea.

Shea agreed that someday soon his job should officially become fulltime, with higher pay. “It is a big responsibility. You run the town.” He proposed that changes be considered for the town supervisor election in 2017, “so the next person” benefits – a hint that perhaps, after a fourth term that begins in January, he will not run again.

He also took responsibility for unilaterally penciling in the councilor raises in a late budget draft and criticized the Putnam County News and Recorder’s coverage of the proposal. It ran a Nov. 18 front-page story: “Democrat Town Board Members To Give Themselves $1,000 Raises Thursday Night.”

“I thought that was inaccurate and gives people bad information,” Shea said.

One thought on “Town Board Adopts $9.75M Budget; $7.4M to Come from Taxes

  1. Kudos to the Town Board for declining the raises, which even the supervisor admits were “unilaterally penciled in” very late in the game.

    It seems like this is a recurring issue with all our local boards. The solution is simple – announce and vote on any plans to increase salaries for elected representatives in advance of their next election. The raises should not take effect until after each elected official has faced the voters again.

    If the increases are reasonable and necessary to reflect the time commitment required for these roles, then make the case to the voters and discuss it in the open before they make their choice on election day.

    We wisely amended the Constitution over 20 years ago to require members of Congress to face the voters before they can receive any raises they vote for themselves. This is an important check and balance and we should hold our local officials to the same standard.