Electricity supplier defaults on CCA agreement

About 25,000 households and businesses that had been benefiting from fixed electricity rates as members of a collective purchasing agreement will be sent back to Central Hudson after an energy supply company defaulted on the agreement. 

Columbia Utilities was last year awarded a three-year contract to supply clean energy at a fixed rate to members of Hudson Valley Community Power, which includes Beacon, Philipstown, Cold Spring and seven other municipalities, through what is known as community choice aggregation (CCA). 

Because it buys in bulk, a CCA can often secure members better rates than individuals would pay. Residents and business owners in participating communities were automatically enrolled but could opt out.

Over the last year, Columbia supplied CCA customers with electricity generated from renewable sources for 6.6 cents per kilowatt-hour for households and 7.1 cents for businesses. The electricity continued to be distributed through Central Hudson, which also handled billing.

The change doesn’t necessarily mean CCA customers will pay more for electricity, only that the monthly charges won’t be consistent. Central Hudson’s current rate of 5.8 cents per kilowatt-hour is lower than the agreement with Columbia. But Central Hudson’s rate in February rose to 21.6 cents. 


Joule Community Power, which oversees the CCA, received a letter from Columbia Utilities in February alleging that ongoing technical issues with Central Hudson’s billing system were harming Columbia’s efforts to provide service. Columbia secretly filed notice in April with the state Public Service Commission that it wanted out of the two years remaining on its contract with Joule.

A state judge last month issued a temporary restraining order to give the parties time to negotiate, but during the Beacon City Council meeting on Monday (July 18), City Administrator Chris White said he had been notified that Columbia had already been kicked out of a state energy marketplace. 

On Tuesday, Joule CEO Jessica Stromback explained that Columbia had failed to make scheduled payments to the New York Independent System Operator, a nonprofit corporation that operates the bulk electricity grid, and had been removed by the state as a supplier. 

As a result, the CCA, which was the second formed in New York State, after Sustainable Westchester, will begin transitioning its 25,000 members from the fixed rate to a variable rate. Joule expects the move to take about a month. 

Sustainable Westchester has encountered similar problems. In a letter dated July 1 addressed to members in 24 municipalities, including Peekskill, it said its CCA would be “paused” and customers transitioned back to Con Edison because its supplier, Westchester Power, could not provide a fixed rate for a contract to replace one that expired June 30. The reason given was “extreme volatility in electricity prices.”

Joule and municipal officials will soon begin looking for ways to restart the CCA, Stromback said. She said the program had saved members $8 million over the last year. 

“Everybody’s unhappy that Columbia broke their contract but, if anything, I think they’re seeing the value of the CCA,” Stromback said. “It’s much more a question of, ‘This was valuable — How do we maintain it? How do we move it forward?’ ”

White told the City Council on Monday that Beacon would support any legal action Joule takes against Columbia. “The municipalities are not at fault; this is squarely the fault of Columbia Utilities,” he said.

Earlier this month, the Philipstown Town Board voted to join any litigation filed against Columbia, which is based in Brooklyn. A legal agreement accompanying its resolution stated that any money awarded the plaintiffs would go toward Joule’s expenses and then to CCA members.

Councilor Jason Angell noted that Philipstown had “helped push the CCA forward” and that it saved some residents $200 per month over the winter, when Central Hudson rates soared. “So it’s a big deal,” he said. “Getting kicked off is going to hurt people.”

Behind The Story

Type: News

News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.

Simms has covered Beacon for The Current since 2015. He studied journalism at Appalachian State University and has reported for newspapers in North Carolina and Maryland. Location: Beacon. Languages: English. Area of expertise: Beacon politics

One reply on “Customers Sent Back to Central Hudson”

  1. It’s a shame that Columbia Utilities defaulted on its contract. Presumably the company felt it was missing out on the grotesque profits energy firms are enjoying under cover of global inflation. Community choice aggregation is a great idea with a track record of success, but this setback points out a key limitation.

    As we endure yet another summer of record heatwaves, drought and wildfires, it has become increasingly clear that the private sector alone will not solve the climate crisis. As long as we depend on for-profit companies like Columbia to supply energy, the transition away from fossil fuels will lag behind what the crisis demands. In fact, from 2004 to 2022, New York went from 2 percent wind and solar to just 4 percent (far behind states like Texas, Kansas and California), and it is nowhere near on track to fulfill its mandate under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act to achieve 70 percent renewables by 2030 and 100 percent by 2040.

    Last week’s public hearing in the state Assembly on the Build Public Renewables Act (BPRA) showed there is another way. The BPRA would empower the New York Power Authority to rapidly expand public renewables, making energy cleaner, cheaper and more dependable for New Yorkers while adding as many as 50,000 good-paying jobs. Predictably, industry lobbyists testified against the bill, hoping to protect their profits from competition, but expert after expert testified that the bill is not only viable but necessary.

    The BPRA is tantalizingly close to passage. It passed the Senate this year but was never brought to the floor in the Assembly — something advocates want the Legislature to rectify by convening a special session this summer. This must happen. We simply cannot wait another year to act on climate change.

Comments are closed.