By Michael Turton

The hour glass has been turned on end and the final countdown has begun for Cold Spring residents to comment about the future of their village. The Special Board charged with writing a new Comprehensive Plan for the village released the draft version of the plan on Sept. 29. On the following evening it held the first of two public information meetings to review the draft recommendations. The second public information meeting will be held at 730 p.m. on Thursday, October 7 at the VFW Hall on Kemble Avenue. The last opportunity for public comment will be a formal public hearing scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 14 at 7:30 pm at the Cold Spring Fire Hall. The public hearing will remain open until Thursday, Oct. 21 – the last date that written or verbal comments will be accepted before the Special Board votes to recommend the plan to the village board.
       At last week’s meeting Ted Fink, a principal in the Rhinebeck-based planning firm Green Plan, said there are many advantages for the village to have an updated plan in place, including the fact that many senior government grants require it. The new plan will replace one approved in 1987. Fink, whose firm assisted with the final stages of drafting the plan, said that he has seen Comprehensive Plans as short as one page while others have been “thousands of pages.” Cold Spring’s comes in at a concise eighty-nine pages that include many charts, maps and a sixteen page summary of the initial resident survey, which kicked off the planning process. Special Board Chair Mike Armstrong said that he hopes that the recommended plan is adopted “..sooner rather than later, but it is really up to the Village Board.  We hope they will act expeditiously.”
       Once it receives the recommended Comprehensive Plan from the Special Board, the Village Board will hold its own formal hearing to publicly review the document. It will also conduct the SEQR – the Environmental Quality Review required by New York State. The Village Board will then be responsible for amending the village zoning code to ensure that it is in harmony with the new Comprehensive Plan. There were very few questions about the actual content of the plan at last week’s meeting. Most inquiries related to procedures and how the plan will be implemented.

Special Board chair Mike Armstrong

One resident said he felt that Main Street Cold Spring is a “slice of Americana that is appreciated and cherished” and wondered aloud if by moving the fire hall and village hall away from Main Street, “Will we lose its special qualities?” The plan suggests the village consider moving the fire hall and village hall to the former Butterfield Hospital site. Armstrong agreed that it is a “key issue.” He said, “Main Street needs to have reasons for resident to use it – not just visitors. The question is what would they (the fire hall and village hall) be replaced with? Butterfield must be carefully thought through.”
       Contacted after the meeting by, Armstrong said that certain aspects of the plan remain controversial even among members of the Special Board, some of whom have worked on the plan for more than four years.  Board issues in contention include the best approach for meeting the village’s parking needs; whether or not to allow accessory apartments; encouraging home-based businesses; the best use of the Dockside property and the possible creation of a looped walking trail from Cold Spring’s waterfront to Little Stony Point. The Special Board does not have to reach a consensus on the plan in order to approve it. Armstrong said that a simple majority vote in favor will send the recommended plan to the Village Board. He expects the Special Board to vote on the recommended plan on Oct. 28; a week after the public hearing closes.
       One of the concepts discussed at last week’s meeting was a move towards “form-based zoning.” That approach does not delineate specific permitted uses in a given area. Instead it permits mixed uses while ensuring that any proposed new use does not have a negative impact. Fink said that such an approach is desirable in the village, because Cold Spring was developed long before typical, suburban zoning was developed. Contemporary zoning typically has included rigidly defined areas for each type of use. Throughout the planning process residents expressed the strong view that Cold Spring’s historic and small village character should be preserved. Fink said that form-based zoning is more in keeping with that desire compared to the “cookie cutter” zoning used in suburban communities in the past.
       The weather for last week’s public information meeting was anything but nice. The tail end of a tropical storm ripped through the region that evening, bringing with it heavy rains and high winds. Parts of Cold Spring were left without power. Fortunately for the meeting’s organizers, the VFW Hall’s lights stayed on and despite miserable conditions about thirty people attended to discuss the draft plan. “I was amazed at the turnout given the weather. I thought the meeting would be completely washed out” Armstrong said. Special Board members are no doubt hoping for more cooperative weather and a larger turnout at the Oct. 7 session. It has been a long road to get to this stage of a planning process that began in 2006. “I think itis fantastic to be at this point. We’re not all the way to the finish line – but we can see it” Armstrong said.
       The complete draft Comprehensive Plan can be viewed by clicking on  here .

Behind The Story

Type: News

News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.

Turton, who has been a reporter for The Current since its founding in 2010, moved to Philipstown from his native Ontario in 1998. Location: Cold Spring. Languages: English. Area of expertise: Cold Spring government, features

5 replies on “Cold Spring Plan Nears the Finish Line”

  1. Its only been out for a few days. How could we be running out of time! If thats so we need to have more time to review. What i have seen so far looks good but would like more Time.

  2. Thanks for the story on the work of the Cold Spring Special Board for a Comprehensive Plan. I think the sentence ending your first paragraph needs some clarification. It reads: “The public hearing will remain open until Thursday, Oct. 21 — the last date that written or verbal comments will be accepted before the Special Board votes to accept the plan.”

    The Special Board voted on September 23 to publish the draft Comprehensive Plan on September 29 (and has done so). The next step, after the Public Information meeting October 7 and the Public Hearing October 14 and 21, is for the Special Board to vote on recommending the Comprehensive Plan to the Village Trustees. The Special Board will not “accept” the plan in the sense of “approving” or “adopting” it, but simply recommend it to the village board.

    Even after that recommendation, the public will have the opportunity to comment — to the Village Board, which must hold its own hearing before it can vote to adopt the plan.

    Mike Armstrong
    chair, Special Board for a Comprehensive Plan/LWRP

  3. I wrote Mike Armstrong with observation that having review meetings at the same time on the same day of the week eliminated the opportunity to participate for those of us who are working at that time (or not home yet from a commute)…and suggested that they might want to schedule a meeting at a ifferent time – am, weekend, etc… Got no response – I for one can’t be there, as I work in POK till after 8 p… Could we consider having a meeting at another time?

  4. The plan is very long and many of the ideas in it seem to be beyond the scope of a comprehensive plan. People need time to digest what’s in it because many of the recommendations are getting their first public airing. We also need other avenues for people to respond with their comments to the board, and the board needs time to consider all feedback and revise the plan before submitting it to the village board. The plan does a good job of framing many of the key issues but now we need time to debate those issues so the plan becomes a shared community vision and not a collection of opinions.

  5. It is time to stop procrastinating and get off the fence. From what the CS Mayor has said we cannot do it alone and if it takes partnering with the County and pooling all our resources lets do it.The firehouse will not be in the Butterfield Hospital but will be built on part of the property. If the Village feels their offices should be on Main Street, sobeit. Anyone who visits the present firehouse knows they are very short on space and parking especially on the weekends should a call occur. Also anyone who feels that our firemen are not firemen and just “pretend firemen” should go through the training they have to go through to become a volunteer fireman. Let’s all work together, see if we can get the property and get on with what it should or should not be used for.

Comments are closed.