Neighbors Oppose Rock Street Excavation

Rock street

The village issued a stop-work order on a driveway being constructed on Rock Street. (Photo by M. Turton)

Work described as ‘end run around village law’

An excavation at 29-31 Rock St. in Cold Spring that was halted last week by a stop-work order will be addressed on Dec. 23 at a public hearing.

The project, which was discussed at length at the Tuesday (Dec. 8) meeting of the Village Board, was referred on Dec. 2 to the Historic District Review Board by Charlotte Mountain, the village code enforcement officer. Neighbors claimed the application for excavating should have been approved by the HDRB and the Planning Board before the permit was issued. 

Mountain approved a permit last month for the property owner, William McComish, to extend the driveway and parking at the site, which has a steep rock outcrop. 

In a document submitted to the village on Tuesday, eight residents who live near the site described McComish’s application as “an end run around Cold Spring law to begin a construction project that involves massive environmental impact and potentially multiple structures.” 

Last year, McComish withdrew a request to the ZBA for a variance to construct a third residence on the property. 

McComish said on Wednesday that he does not intend to build another house. “I’m getting older; I’m 75,” he said. “I simply want access to the top of my property, without having to go over slippery rock.” 

At the Village Board meeting on Tuesday, Planning Board Chair Matt Francisco said that because McComish’s application to extend the driveway was not a change of use, it did not require review by that board. 

However, the property is within Cold Spring’s historic district, and among the criteria the HDRB considers is the effect a project may have on natural resources, including geological features such as rock outcroppings. 

Sean Conway, the vice chair of the Historic District Review Board, wrote in an email on Thursday that his panel will decide after the public hearing whether to approve a “certificate of appropriateness” for the Rock Street project. The code enforcement officer would then determine whether the stop-work order can be removed, he said. 

At the Village Board meeting, residents objecting to the project also complained that the work site lacked barriers to prevent debris from hitting homes and cars. One neighbor, Trevor McCarthy, who lives around the corner from the site, said he found granite on his porch and near his car.

“We take your safety concerns seriously,” Mayor Dave Merandy said. “The flying debris should have been screened better, and if we were tardy in addressing that, I apologize.”

Merandy also noted that had a “steep slopes” provision being considered as part of the update of the village code been in effect, it might have prevented the Rock Street excavation. “But we have to follow the existing code,” he said. 

When asked what recourse residents objecting to the project might have if the code enforcement officer erred in issuing the permit, Merandy responded, “That is a question for our attorney. 

“We’ll see where the HDRB goes,” he said. “There will be some legal squabbling.”

In other business …

The board approved annual appointments for 2021. While most remained the same, new appointments include incoming Trustee Kathleen Foley as representative to the Cold Spring Fire Co.; incoming Trustee Heidi Bender to the Audit and Insurance/Risk Management committees; and Eric Wirth to chair the Zoning Board of Appeals.  

Citing traffic and safety concerns, the board declined a request from village resident Natella Alhoca to set up a food truck at Main and Chestnut streets.

The Cold Spring Police Department responded to 52 calls for service in November, and officers issued 23 traffic and 119 parking tickets. The Cold Spring Fire Co. responded to 18 alarms. 

The village reservoirs are at 97 percent capacity, a 10 percent increase over this time last year.

One thought on “Neighbors Oppose Rock Street Excavation

  1. While 29 Rock St. did come before the Zoning Board of Appeals in October 2019 for construction of a third residence on the property, the application was withdrawn, and the ZBA never held a public hearing for a variance. The property is in the industrial district, which does not allow a use of multiple residences. It is not correct to say that the ZBA denied a request for a variance.

    Wolfe is the former chair of the ZBA.