Shakespeare Plans: An Update

HVSF garden render

The Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival is hoping in 2022 to move from its location at Boscobel to land that is now part of The Garrison golf course. This rendering, looking north, shows the performance tent on the left and an entrance and parking on the right. The buildings at the top-right would be an indoor theater and 20-room inn.

The Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival would like to move in 2022 from its seasonal home at Boscobel on Route 9D to land donated by Chris Davis at The Garrison golf course on Route 9, which overlooks the Hudson River.

To accomplish this, the HVSF has assembled a team of specialists to create a master plan, including landscape architects, a civil engineer, a legal firm, a traffic engineer, an environmental planner and an acoustics expert.

The plan has been submitted to the Philipstown Planning Board, whose seven members at their monthly meetings are reviewing a state-mandated environmental assessment form (EAF). The Planning Board also would approve the site plan, although the Town Board must first agree to change the zoning for the property, which lies in a larger rural conservation district and a planned development district specific to the golf course.

“It is a complicated application,” said Neal Zuckerman, who chairs the Planning Board, on Wednesday (April 7). “I suspect it’s the largest project proposed in Philipstown in quite some time.”

According to its environmental assessment form, HVSF also will be seeking a wetland permit from the Philipstown Conservation Board; septic and highway work permits from Putnam County; an “aqueduct crossing review” from New York City; and highway work and stormwater permits from the state. 

New view at HVSF

A view from the proposed HVSF site (Photo provided)

For 2021, HVSF will perform under its tent at Boscobel, its last of 32 seasons through 2019, before the 2020 performances were canceled because of pandemic restrictions. If the project is approved, HVSF hopes to move its Boscobel tent to the site at Route 9 and Snake Hill Road for 2022 performances.

With permits in hand, in May 2022 it would install its temporary tent; repair the entry roads; upgrade the parking lots; add lighting; repurpose the golf pro shop and golf cart barn; build a service road to the performance space; and install basic landscaping.

With further approvals, in 2023 and 2024 it would construct a permanent tent with slightly fewer seats than the Boscobel tent, which has 535; a 1,200-square-foot box office and welcome center; and a 4,000-square-foot “back of house” building with dressing rooms for the actors.

Summer 2021

HVSF plans, starting in June, to present two plays at Boscobel, The Tempest and The Most Spectacularly Lamentable Trial of Miz Martha Washington, by James Ijames. Tickets have not gone on sale but initially will be limited under state guidelines to 25 percent of the house, or about 130 seats. That could mean that shows quickly sell out. For HVSF to offer more, the state would need to relax social-distancing restrictions.

In later phases, which HSVF says “could be many years or decades away” (the environmental assessment form gives a construction window of 2022 to 2031), the festival proposes constructing an indoor theater with 225 seats; a rehearsal space; a 2,400-square-foot pavilion; a 2,500-square-foot building with concessions and restrooms; and 26 two-bedroom cabins for the seasonal performers. In recent seasons, performers have lived for the summer in hotels in Fishkill.

Philipstown in 2005 approved a 40-room hotel and spa for The Garrison site, but it was never built. HVSF said it would like eventually to receive approval for 14 additional rooms to expand The Garrison inn from 8 to 20 rooms and build the performer cabins.

At its January meeting, a Planning Board member asked HVSF for clarification about site capacity. HVSF said that if everything were operating simultaneously at full capacity — including a performance, a wedding banquet and a packed restaurant and hotel — there would be about 1,100 guests and staff and 400 cars.

But, it noted, event management would avoid that scenario. It said it expected only about five summer nights a year to be exceptionally busy, and activity for rest of the time to be about half-capacity. “We believe that it is economically and environmentally unsustainable to provide extra capacity for a level of activity that is only present on the site a few times each year,” HVSF said in a written response.

cabins

The HVSF has proposed seasonal cabins for the property that would serve as housing for performers. (Image provided)

Another board member expressed concern that HVSF’s calculations that each car would carry an average of 2.79 occupants were too generous. The festival responded that Philipstown code requires one parking space for every three seats at a restaurant or place of public assembly, so that 12 seated guests and one employee would require four spaces, or 3.25 people per vehicle. It said it relied on calculations from the Federal Highway Administration, which suggested a range of 2.2 to 2.8 occupants for restaurants, banquets and events.

The Planning Board will continue its review of the environmental impact report at its meeting scheduled for Thursday (April 15) via Zoom. For a link to attend, email [email protected] 

Four Big Questions

We asked Davis McCallum, the artistic director of the HVSF, to share the most common questions he’s been asked about the project and his responses.

What about the traffic?
I’ve been having a lot of detailed conversations about this. Obviously we share peoples’ concern, in particular about the dangerous intersection at Route 9, Snake Hill and Travis Corners. We are starting a conversation with DOT [the state Department of Transportation] about a traffic intervention of some kind, most likely a signal, and I hope that’s something the community will embrace.

Will the tent interrupt the ridgeline?
I’ve heard people say the tent will be positioned at the crown of the ridge, which is not true. It will be halfway down the slope of the 11th fairway. The high land is at the 11th tee. The property is in a cup with higher ridgelines around it on three sides, and that’s why it’s not designated as a scenic ridgeline. If you go over to Route 9W [in Orange County], as I did on Easter Sunday, and look back, you’ll see the golf course, because 80 acres of trees were clear-cut to create it in 1960. But you also see that it’s halfway up the topography. You should not imagine the current tent because we engaged an extraordinary architect to design a structure that will be nested into the grade of the land. The tent topper will be visible and the rest kind of set into the ground. It’s not going to be invisible, but it’s going to be beautiful.

Is it just too big, or too much? Is it going to become another Breakneck?
We’re not advertising this as a hiking destination. It’s privately owned land, not a public park. That said, we’re trying to maintain access so that you don’t have to be a ticket-holder to enjoy the view. Our plan is to maintain the access that community members have long enjoyed to walk their dogs, go snowshoeing, come for a jog, etc. It’s at our discretion to operate the site in such a way that prevents overuse, so we’re not going to be saying, “Hey everybody, come have a picnic.” What I have been surprised by is the characterization of our local arts organization as “the developer,” because I don’t think that reflects our intentions or the project. I don’t think it’s fair to compare it to Butterfield or where outsiders have said, “We have a big plan.” We’re proposing moving an arts organization that has been on Route 9D for 33 years to Route 9.

What happens if HVSF closes?
Chris Davis is putting into his offer of the land a reversion clause so that the land cannot be further subdivided or developed for unrelated commercial or residential use. If HVSF ever ceased to exist, the land would go to a conservation organization such as Scenic Hudson or the Hudson Highlands Land Trust.

Below are a series of maps prepared by HVSF showing its plans. A Jan. 28 presentation by HVSF can also be downloaded as a PDF.

2 thoughts on “Shakespeare Plans: An Update

  1. The view out my south-facing windows is The Garrison golf course. My family and I are proud to call Garrison our home for more than 15 years. When we first heard that the Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival would move to the golf course, we were tentatively supportive, but wanted to know more. We have always loved the HVSF and last year bought tickets to show our support [despite the shows being canceled].

    The more we read about the scope of this project, the more our support has turned to concern. I am in touch with many neighbors who feel similarly. I have watched all of the Philipstown Planning Board meetings and attended a site visit. The more I hear, the more questions that I have. Though I am sure all of the experts will create a beautiful design, the issues are not so much with the looks but about the effects and impacts by the tens to hundreds of thousands of visitors in their cars on our community, roads, resources and environment annually. We must not just think about next year but possibly 10 years or more in advance. We are a tiny hamlet and the thought of a potential Caramoor [in Katonah] or Jacob’s Pillow [in Massachusetts] is worrisome.

    I believe that Chris Davis’ goal to preserve The Garrison land is fantastic, but I wonder about the effects of all of these people on our natural oasis. I am sure that there could be other types of usages that could preserve the land without so much impact, but obviously this is for Mr. Davis to decide.

    When I read that Davis McCallum, the HVSF artistic director, is surprised that the HVSF is being characterized as a developer, I wonder why, when you consider the scope of its wish list. I see this as a massive commercial land development. Though HVSF considers itself an arts organization that has been on Route 9D for 33 years and wants to move to Route 9, I see a commercial events/entertainment company seeking a tremendous expansion of its existing business model.

    At the March 18 Planning Board meeting, the chair, Neal Zuckerman, said that all think this is a good project but asked: “How much is too much? How much activity can this area handle? What is too much, from the number of people, to the number of buildings, gallons of water, number of toilets?”

    He couldn’t have said it better. Let’s take our time to analyze this massive project carefully and think clearly about its im-pacts on the Garrison that we love so much as it is now.

  2. As Shakespeare wrote in Henry V, “the game is afoot.” Davis McCallum said that if you look at The Garrison site from across the river, “you’ll see the golf course, because 80 acres of trees were clear-cut to create it.”

    It must be recognized that the ridgeline on which the development plans to place its 500-seat, permanent tent was visible from across the river before the golf course was built. When I was a bit younger and Bill Brown’s Physical Training Farm was still in operation, I remember those fields quite well. I expect the extreme wind, summer lightning strikes and intermittent grass fires kept them open and the views extraordinary. I believe that the club also had a short three-hole pitch and putting course set up to help Jackie Gleason and his cronies stay sober!

    I was working on the clearing crew back in 1962 for Larry Wanamaker, who headed up the crew for The North Redoubt Club, as it was then to be called. Most of our work was clearing the land for what are now holes No. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, the land of the Pope estate north of Philipse Brook Road. Hole No. 8 was also a thicket, and perhaps clearing it was the quid pro quo that New York City needed to allow present holes No. 7 and 8 to be built on its property.

Leave a Reply

The Current welcomes comments on its coverage and local issues. Submissions are selected by the editor to provide a variety of opinions and voices, and all are subject to editing for accuracy, clarity and length. We ask that writers remain civil and avoid personal attacks. Submissions must include your first and last name (no pseudonyms), as well as a valid email address (which will not be published). Please allow up to 24 hours for an approved submission to be posted. All online comments may also appear in print.